Liverpool: 0151 224 0500   |   Manchester: 0161 827 4600   |   Email: info@bermans.co.uk   |   Twitter Icon  |  Linkedin Icon
bermans_logo

Ajith Prasad

Associate

Ajith joined Bermans in March 2024 and is an Associate in our Litigation team based in Liverpool.

He works with SME’s, business owners, lenders and property developers and his areas of expertise include:

  • Contract disputes
  • Shareholder/partnership disputes
  • Property disputes
  • Finance litigation
  • Professional negligence
  • Debt recovery

Ajith studied Law at Manchester Metropolitan University and The Legal Practice Course at The University of Law.

Outside of work, he enjoys playing and watching cricket, golf and football, as well as reading (historical non-fiction).

Contact Ajith:

E:ajith.prasad@bermans.co.uk

T:0151 224 0512

linkedin link

 

Continue Reading

Jenny Chapman

Trainee Solicitor

Jenny joined Bermans in April 2023 as a paralegal in our asset based lending team and is currently a Trainee Solicitor in our Litigation and Corporate teams based in Manchester.

She graduated with a Law Degree in 2021 and the LPC with Business and Management MSc in 2022 at Liverpool University.

Jenny assists the Litigation team in forfeiture cases, commercial litigation matters and contract disputes. She also works with the Corporate team advising SMEs and owner managed businesses in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and general corporate matters.

Outside of work, Jenny likes to stay active being a keen runner, skier and gym go-er.


E: jenny.chapman@bermans.co.uk

T: 0161 393 7120

Continue Reading

Battle of the Forms

Palma Percze

Palma Percze

When businesses enter into contracts with one another, it is common for them to want their own terms and conditions (Ts&Cs) to apply to the contract. However, whether these have been successfully implemented into the contract often does not seem to be of concern to the parties until a dispute presents itself. Having the Ts&Cs adequately incorporated is especially important since it is common practice for businesses to conduct their dealings through contractual documents such as purchase orders and invoices rather than having an actual written contract in place. By not having a signed contract in place, the parties open up themselves to scrutiny over which party’s Ts&Cs are to prevail in case of a dispute.

Continue Reading

Who Is Your Contract With?

You have – all things considered – enjoyed a fruitful trading relationship with a supplier or customer over many years, or at least you have assumed that to be the case.

Then things go sour.  You locate your copy of the contract, only to find that it was made by your predecessor company, or the other party’s predecessor, or even both.  The change(s) may have been due to a corporate reorganisation.  In any case there is no evidence in writing of consent to the change, as required under the contract.

Continue Reading

Post-Covid World: Debt Recovery (Webinar Event)

This 60 minute webinar will take place at 10am on Tuesday 26th April 2022.

The session will focus on tips to ensure that your invoices are paid and some steps you can take to protect yourself and to recover outstanding debts.

The main topics that we plan to cover are:

  • Impact of Covid-19
  • Debt collection checklist
  • Pre-Court procedures – What you can do
  • Going legal – what are your options
Continue Reading

SME debt is a ticking time bomb

Pat Haver

Pat Haver

Recent independent studies undertaken by the Legal Services Board and Xero convey a worrying and consistent theme that SME debt is a ticking time bomb.

UK SMEs are losing more than £40 Billion per year through disputes and have £131 Billion tied up in late payments. YouGov has reported that 82% of SMEs currently have outstanding balances with each firm owed an average £62,957.00.

Continue Reading

Supreme Court swaps old test for new one in professional negligence claims

Andrew Koffman

Manchester Building Society (MBS) successfully appealed to the Supreme Court in a claim for negligence against its ex-auditors Grant Thornton (GT), after losing in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

The facts of the case are quite unusual.  However the judgment is of wider importance since the court took a different approach to assessing loss arising from an adviser’s breach of duty, from the previous line of cases going back to the 1990s, and the decision should signal a change of direction.

 

Continue Reading